After the final junior varsity choir rehearsal, I was back into the
music theory class. They began by reviewing their homework, in which they had
to add the alto and tenor parts and four part score and analyze with roman
numerals underneath. It was in a major key and had no inversions for the roman
numerals. Mr. Crawford checked their homework for completion and then went
around the room and for every new chord, asked a different student what the
notes were in the chord, which note they doubled, and what they had for the
roman numeral analysis. After reviewing the homework, Mr. Crawford then
introduced the concept of first and second inversion triads and the rules for
doubling notes in regards to each of those chords. It was quite a confusing
topic for the students to grasp, so they did multiple exercises as a class
discussing first only first inversion triads and then second inversion triads.
They also discussed how to notate them as roman numerals and why the numbers
are the way that they are. Even though the students were confused and not
grasping the concept right away, they were relaxed because they knew that Mr.
Crawford would be patient with them and wait to move on until they understood.
I think that grading music theory homework based on completion and
effort is a good way to assess how the students are doing because being such a
difficult concept that only gets harder as you go, it would be unfair to mark
students down for something completely new that they are trying to learn. If I
was teaching that class, again I would do more examples on the board because
visual comprehension would explain a lot of the confusing concepts that are portrayed
by orally explaining the theory. I do like the moving at the pace of the class
though because it didn’t overwhelm the students so they were actually making a valiant
effort to understand what was going on, especially because they knew Mr.
Crawford would stop class to help them.
No comments:
Post a Comment